Learn English with Red Dwarf 2

← More videos in Vids

Hibiscus Teach · Vids · Series

Learn English with Red Dwarf 2

How Not to Handle a Crisis

An alert becomes an argument, and a meeting produces some spectacularly unhelpful suggestions. Explore how rules, emotions and the language of leadership affect a group's decisions.

B2–C1 · AdultsApproximately 55 minutes

Created by , British English teacher.

Content note: Adults. Crude insults, sexual references and comic threats, including an explicit regulation joke and a sexual acronym. The scenes present fictional emergencies and deliberately poor decisions.

A little context: These scenes come from different episodes. In Legion, the crew respond to a possible threat aboard their small spacecraft, Starbug. In Polymorph, a creature has removed a different emotion from each crew member, changing how they approach a problem. You do not need to know the wider story.

Watch each clip, then try its activities.

Study guidance

Use the clips to compare interpretations and practise short exchanges. Ask for one scene detail to support each claim, then move into the speaking task. Choose follow-ups that develop the learner's answer.

  • Explain how a speaker's tone and priorities affect a group's response to a problem.
  • Distinguish a useful procedure from an action that mainly creates an appearance of control.
  • Acknowledge competing suggestions and guide a short discussion towards a practical decision.

These words help you discuss the scenes; not all are spoken in the clips. Vocabulary examples, grammar transformations, recorded practice, imagined scenarios and possible speaking answers are original teaching material.

Before you watch

  1. An important event is about to start and something breaks. Who would you want beside you: a strict rule-follower, a fearless improviser or a calm negotiator? Choose one and name a possible drawback.

    One possible answer

    I would choose the calm negotiator because they might keep people focused. The drawback is that they could spend too long trying to satisfy everyone when a quick decision is needed.

    What one instruction would you give that person before the event?

  2. Imagine that fear or anger could be switched off for a day. Which would you switch off, and what useful warning might you lose?

    One possible answer

    I might switch off anger because small frustrations would bother me less. However, I might also fail to notice when someone was treating me unfairly. I would want calmness without losing the ability to object.

    Can an emotion be unpleasant and useful at the same time?

Blue Alert: looking in control

The crew detect a possible threat, but Rimmer wants the response to follow the proper procedure.

Notice what each speaker thinks the alert is supposed to achieve.

Watch on YouTube ↗

English scene guide

The Cat senses something nearby. Rimmer wants a formal alert; Lister questions its purpose. Kryten reveals that Rimmer has cited an irrelevant rule. Escalating the alert then requires an ordinary change of equipment. The mismatch between official seriousness and practical reality drives the joke.

Watch and check · 6 questions

Choose one answer for each question. Use details from the scene; open the scene guide if you need support.

1. How does the Cat initially detect something nearby?
2. Why does Rimmer insist on blue alert?
3. What is Lister's initial objection to the alert?
4. How does Kryten undermine Rimmer's reference to a Space Corps directive?
5. What practical change would red alert require?
6. Which contrast best explains the humour of the alert exchange?

1–2 minGrammar in a minuteC1 · Mixed conditionals: an earlier choice with a result now

I would just feel more comfortable

Original practice, not dialogue from the programme.

Use an imagined earlier action to explain how the situation would be different now.

Had we agreed our priorities yesterday, we would know what to do now.

If + past perfect can describe an unreal earlier action while would + infinitive describes its unreal present result. Formal Had + subject + past participle omits if without changing that time relationship. Compare wouldn't still be arguing now with wouldn't have argued then: the second moves the result into the past.

Original scenario: the team did not check the procedure earlier and is still arguing now. Which formal transformation preserves the unreal earlier condition and the continuing present result?

You say: Give a different earlier preparation and explain how it would change the situation now. Start Had we… .

Speaking · 3 prompts

Speak before opening a possible answer. When interpreting the scene, support your view with one detail. The imagined situations are original practice.

  1. Is Rimmer mainly trying to improve safety, reassure himself or establish authority? Rank these motives and defend your first choice.

    Useful language
    • The strongest clue is…
    • He may mean well, but…
    • A different interpretation would be…
    One possible answer

    I would put reassurance first because he explains that a formal alert would make him more comfortable. Establishing authority seems important too: he invokes a regulation to strengthen his position. Improving safety may be his intention, but he does not clearly explain what the order changes.

    What could Rimmer say to make the practical purpose of his order clearer?

  2. Original scenario: a warning light switches on, although everyone in the room already knows about the problem. Give one situation in which the light still helps and one in which it adds little.

    Useful language
    • It could still be useful if…
    • It would add little when…
    One possible answer

    The light could help someone arriving later or remind the team that the problem remains unresolved. It adds little if it conveys no new information and distracts people from the response. I would judge it by what people need to do differently when they see it.

    What information should accompany an alert so that people can act on it?

  3. Original role-play: a projector fails two minutes before a talk. Your colleague insists on completing a long incident form immediately. Acknowledge the useful purpose of the form, then suggest a practical first step.

    Useful language
    • I understand why we need…
    • For the next two minutes, could we…?
    • Once we've…, we can…
    One possible answer

    I understand why we need a record of the fault. For the next two minutes, could we check whether the speaker can use the spare screen? Once the talk is running, we can complete the form accurately without keeping the audience waiting.

    Your colleague replies that the form is compulsory. Keep the requirement and negotiate who does what first.

The Meeting: every suggestion is a problem

A creature has altered the crew's emotions, and their attempt to agree on a response becomes increasingly absurd.

Match each speaker's behaviour to the kind of judgement the group is missing.

Watch on YouTube ↗

English scene guide

With important emotions missing, the crew's judgement becomes distorted. Rimmer favours discussion and campaigning, Lister welcomes reckless action, Kryten treats someone else's safety as expendable, and the Cat dismisses his own views. Polite meeting language cannot compensate for their failure to assess suggestions sensibly.

Watch and check · 6 questions

Choose one answer for each question. Focus on what each character proposes or does in the meeting.

1. Which missing emotion helps explain Rimmer's unusually conciliatory approach?
2. What characterises Lister's proposed response?
3. How does the Cat respond when invited to contribute?
4. What does Kryten suggest doing with Lister?
5. What makes Rimmer's supposedly forceful response surprising?
6. What does Rimmer eventually identify as the group's central issue?

1–2 minGrammar in a minuteC1 · The mandative subjunctive: proposing a course of action

I propose we hit it hard

Original practice, not dialogue from the programme.

Distinguish a proposed requirement from a statement about what already happens.

I propose that every suggestion be assessed before we vote.

After propose, recommend or insist used to demand an action, formal English can use that + subject + base verb. In the passive, use be + past participle, even with a singular subject. British English also permits should be assessed. Insist used to assert a fact has a different meaning: she insists that the system is safe.

Original proposal: choose the formal mandative subjunctive. I propose that every suggestion ___ before we vote.

You say: Make one formal proposal for a meeting, using that + subject + be + past participle.

Speaking · 3 prompts

Explain your interpretation before opening a possible answer. The role-play is original practice.

  1. Which missing emotion causes the biggest problem for this group? Choose one character and explain both the immediate effect and what that emotion normally contributes.

    Useful language
    • Without…, the character…
    • Normally, that emotion can help us…
    • However, too much of it…
    One possible answer

    I would choose Lister's missing fear. He treats a dangerous proposal as attractive because he no longer considers his own safety. Fear can make us pause and assess a risk. Too much fear can prevent action, but removing it completely does not automatically make someone brave or sensible.

    Would your choice change if the group faced an unfair decision instead of a dangerous creature?

  2. Rimmer sounds welcoming and organised. Which parts of his meeting language could help a real group, and where does his approach lose its purpose?

    Useful language
    • The useful part is…
    • The difficulty begins when…
    • I would keep…, but change…
    One possible answer

    Inviting everyone to contribute and acknowledging ideas could help a real group. The problem is that he does not evaluate whether the suggestions address the threat. He also gives naming the group too much importance. I would keep the respectful language and add a clear objective and decision deadline.

    Give Rimmer one replacement sentence that would bring the meeting back to its purpose.

  3. Original role-play: your team has ten minutes to choose a venue. One person wants another meeting, another wants to book without checking the price, and a third says their opinion does not matter. Bring all three into a useful decision.

    Useful language
    • We need to decide… by…
    • Before we commit, let's check…
    • I'd like your view on…
    One possible answer

    We need to choose a venue in ten minutes. Before we commit, let's check capacity and price for our two strongest options. We can use this meeting to decide once we have those facts. And I'd like your view on accessibility: that is something the rest of us may have overlooked.

    The quiet person still hesitates. Ask a smaller question that makes it easier to contribute.

Listen and repeat

Listen, repeat, then try each original situation before opening a possible response.

Download the British-English MP3

Let's establish what we actually know.

Separate confirmed information from assumptions before choosing a response.

You say: a colleague reports a serious problem but has only heard a rumour. Ask for the facts before deciding what to do.

One possible response

Let's establish what we actually know. What have we confirmed so far, and what are we still assuming?

Stress actually and know. Pause after the expression before asking about the facts.

I can see the reason for that, but what would it change?

Acknowledge an idea while asking about its practical effect.

You say: someone suggests completing an extra form while an event is being delayed. Ask how that action would help now.

One possible response

I can see the reason for that, but what would it change? The record may be useful later; our first priority is getting the event started.

Give the acknowledgement a full beat before but. Stress change or now, and keep the question curious.

Could we put that aside until we've agreed on the priority?

Postpone a secondary detail without rejecting it permanently.

You say: the group is discussing decoration while the main plan is still undecided. Bring attention back to the next decision.

One possible response

Could we put that aside until we've agreed on the priority? Let's choose the first step, then return to the details.

Stress priority. Link until we've smoothly, and use an inviting tone.

We seem to be agreeing on everything except what to do.

Point out, with gentle humour, that a friendly discussion has produced no decision.

You say: everyone likes the suggestions, but no one has taken responsibility. Ask for a clear decision and next action.

One possible response

We seem to be agreeing on everything except what to do. Which option are we choosing, who will do it, and when?

Pause slightly before except. Give each part of the final question its own clear stress.

1–2 minGrammar masteryC1 · Concessive fronting: calm though he may be

he's got no anger

Original practice, not dialogue from the programme.

Concede a positive quality while showing that it does not guarantee a good result.

Calm though Rimmer may be, his plan still needs work.

Formal concession can begin adjective + though/as + subject + verb: confident though she may sound. This means although she may sound confident. However uses a different order: however confident she sounds. Despite is followed by a noun phrase or an -ing form, not the clause used here.

Original transformation: acknowledge Rimmer's calmness without treating it as proof of good judgement. Calm ___ Rimmer may be, his plan still needs work.

You say: Concede a useful quality, then name its limit. Begin Confident though… or Calm though… .

Put it all together: chair a better emergency meeting

Original role-play. Take two minutes to reach a decision, then change roles. Use at least two practice expressions. Refer to one useful lesson from each clip; no writing is required.

A fictional spaceship has lost its main lighting. Emergency lights work and the crew are safe for now. One console remains available. It can run a two-minute fault scan, send a help request, or restart the lighting system. The cause is unknown. Choose what to do first, explain why and agree what happens next.

Chairperson

Establish the known facts, invite a concern and end with one agreed action, an owner and a time to reconsider.

Teammate

Prefer a different option. Give a practical reason, ask one question and accept a workable compromise when your main concern has been addressed.

  • Separate a known fact from an assumption.
  • Acknowledge one concern and compare at least two options.
  • Name the first action, who will take it and when the group will reconsider.
One possible exchange

Chairperson: Let's establish what we actually know. The main lights are out, but the emergency lights work. We don't yet know the cause.

Teammate: I think we should send a help request immediately in case the situation gets worse.

Chairperson: I can see the reason for that. The fault scan only takes two minutes and may tell us what help we need. Would you accept trying it first?

Teammate: Provided we don't spend the whole meeting discussing it. Who is going to run the scan?

Chairperson: I'll start it now. Could you prepare the message while it runs? After two minutes, we'll send it if the result is unclear.

Teammate: Agreed. We have an action and a deadline. No time to choose a committee name.

Chairperson: Exactly. And we'll check what the equipment can actually do before announcing another alert.

Second attempt: Repeat in ninety seconds with roles reversed. The teammate now wants to name a committee, appears completely fearless or insists on an optional extra form. Acknowledge the point once, then guide the discussion back to its purpose. Finish by saying one thing you handled more effectively on the second attempt.

In twenty to thirty seconds, name one useful distinction from the lesson and use one new expression in a fresh example.

Tutor notes

Accept a different ranking when the learner distinguishes a plausible motive from an established fact.

Avoid forcing the conclusion that procedures are useless. Ask the learner to specify the purpose of the procedure.

Let the learner divide the work rather than inventing permission to ignore a genuine requirement.

Keep the discussion about the fictional mechanism and everyday experience; do not turn it into a clinical account of emotions.

Ask for a concrete sentence, not only criticism of the character.

Take the three brief responses in turn. The learner should guide the discussion rather than deliver a long speech.